[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHj3AVk+g_O-9bKqHWn4tMJnUGEb7ZPxAgxtEzqMh6JYvHWfNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:30:15 +0300
From: Denis Kirjanov <kirjanov@...il.com>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Staging <driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
Lustre devel <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Future of Lustre in staging
On 11/20/15, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From https://lwn.net/Articles/662979/
>
> --cut--
> Christoph complained a bit about the staging tree. He said that it
> breaks allmodconfig builds, but that problem was evidently fixed a while
> ago. He also dislikes the Lustre filesystem, which has been in staging
> for some time now; Greg agreed and said that he would like to delete it.
> It was generally agreed that the work being done on Lustre is not
> substantial enough to justify its continued presence. Christoph also
> said that the use of the staging tree for code that is about to be
> deleted could be improved; there are, he said, people doing white-space
> fixes on doomed code.
> --end--
>
> Could anyone clarify it?
AFAIK, Intel is going to work more harder on Lustre code, so the best
option would be to wait a bit.
Agreed, checkpatch fixes are just a mess..
>
> -thanks-
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
>
--
Regards / Mit besten Grüßen,
Denis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists