[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564F1253.4000800@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:30:11 +0200
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce
dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason()
On 11/20/2015 02:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Friday 20 November 2015 12:25:06 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2015 01:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Another idea would be to remove the filter function from struct dma_chan_map
>> and pass the map through platform data
>
> Why not unified device properties?
Is this some Windows/ACPI feature? Quick search gives mostly MSDN and
Windows10 related links.
We only need dma_chan_map for platforms which has not been converted to DT and
still using legacy boot. Or platforms which can still boot in legacy mode. In
DT/ACPI mode we do not need this map at all.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists