linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] test_hexdump: go through all possible lengths of buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1448038684.31665.179.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:58:04 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] test_hexdump: go through all possible lengths of
 buffer

On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:07 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11 2015, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.c
> om> wrote:
> 
> > When test for overflow do iterate the buffer length in a range
> > 0 .. BUF_SIZE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/test_hexdump.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/test_hexdump.c b/lib/test_hexdump.c
> > index ed7c6a7..15a6440 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_hexdump.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_hexdump.c
> > @@ -126,17 +126,17 @@ static void __init test_hexdump_set(int
> > rowsize, bool ascii)
> >  	test_hexdump(len, rowsize, 1, ascii);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(bool ascii)
> > +static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(size_t buflen, bool
> > ascii)
> >  {
> > -	char buf[56];
> > +	char buf[TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE];
> >  	const char *t = test_data_1_le[0];
> > -	size_t l = get_random_int() % sizeof(buf);
> > +	size_t l = buflen;
> >  	bool a;
> >  	int e, r;
> >  
> >  	memset(buf, ' ', sizeof(buf));
> >  
> > -	r = hex_dump_to_buffer(data_b, 1, 16, 1, buf, l, ascii);
> > +	r = hex_dump_to_buffer(data_b, 1, 16, 1, buf, buflen,
> > ascii);
> >  
> >  	if (ascii)
> >  		e = 50;
> > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(bool
> > ascii)
> >  		e = 2;
> >  	buf[e + 2] = '\0';
> >  
> > -	if (!l) {
> > +	if (!buflen) {
> >  		a = r == e && buf[0] == ' ';
> >  	} else if (l < 3) {
> >  		a = r == e && buf[0] == '\0';
> 
> 
> Why keep the variable l when it is just a synonym for the new
> parameter buflen? It is quite confusing that you change some but not
> all occurrences of l to buflen. If you want to make the diff minimal
> but still have a descriptive parameter name, just keep the 'size_t l
> =
> buflen;' assignment and don't otherwise refer to buflen. But I think
> it's better to eliminate 'l' and just change everything to
> buflen. Don't mix the two approaches, though.

Okay, I got it for the future, though the series is already in linux-
next, so do we really need to re-hack half of it because of that?

I suppose everything else you noticed I may send as one follow up
patch.

> 
> Rasmus

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/