lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:18:20 -0800
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
	"agross@...eaurora.org" <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: qcom: Add RPM clock controller driver

On Fri 20 Nov 16:39 PST 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 11/19, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..bd0fd0cd50dc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> > +Qualcomm RPM Clock Controller Binding
> > +------------------------------------------------
> > +The RPM is a dedicated hardware engine for managing the shared
> > +SoC resources in order to keep the lowest power profile. It
> > +communicates with other hardware subsystems via shared memory
> > +and accepts clock requests, aggregates the requests and turns
> > +the clocks on/off or scales them on demand.
> > +
> > +Required properties :
> > +- compatible : shall contain only one of the following:
> > +
> > +			"qcom,rpmcc-msm8916"
> 
> We need to add qcom,rpmcc as a generic compatible as well.
> 

The binding is generic and the clock defines global, so this should work
fine on the dt side of things. But how do we implement this?

Which set of clocks does the generic rpmcc actually provide?

Do you foresee that there will be an implementation of the generic rpmcc
or is it just a way to "standardize" the dt binding?

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists