[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151123095048.GB21436@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:50:49 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix up sparse warning in gfpflags_allow_blocking
On Fri 20-11-15 09:40:59, Jeff Layton wrote:
> sparse says:
>
> include/linux/gfp.h:274:26: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types)
> include/linux/gfp.h:274:26: expected bool
> include/linux/gfp.h:274:26: got restricted gfp_t
>
> ...add a forced cast to silence the warning.
>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>
> ---
> include/linux/gfp.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
> index 6523109e136d..8942af0813e3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gfp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static inline int gfpflags_to_migratetype(const gfp_t gfp_flags)
>
> static inline bool gfpflags_allow_blocking(const gfp_t gfp_flags)
> {
> - return gfp_flags & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> + return (bool __force)(gfp_flags & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
Wouldn't (gfp_flags & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) != 0 be easier/better to read?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists