lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1448273546-2567-6-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:12:25 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] x86/cpu: Fix MSR value truncation issue

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

So sparse rightfully complains that the u64 MSR value we're writing into
the STAR MSR, i.e. 0xc0000081, is being truncated:

./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:193:36: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (23001000000000 becomes 0)

because the actual value doesn't fit into the unsigned 32-bit quantity
which are the @low and @high wrmsrl() parameters.

This is not a problem, practically, because gcc is actually being smart
enough here and does the right thing:

  .loc 3 87 0
  xorl    %esi, %esi		# we needz a 32-bit zero
  movl    $2293776, %edx	# 0x00230010 == (__USER32_CS << 16) | __KERNEL_CS go into the high bits
  movl    $-1073741695, %ecx	# MSR_STAR, i.e., 0xc0000081
  movl    %esi, %eax		# low order 32 bits in the MSR which are 0
  #APP
  # 87 "./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h" 1
          wrmsr

More specifically, MSR_STAR[31:0] is being set to 0. That field is
reserved on Intel and on AMD it is 32-bit SYSCALL Target EIP.

I'd strongly guess because Intel doesn't have SYSCALL in compat/legacy
mode and we're using SYSENTER and INT80 there. And for compat syscalls
in long mode we use CSTAR.

So let's fix the sparse warning by writing SYSRET and SYSCALL CS and SS
into the high 32-bit half of STAR and 0 in the low half explicitly.

 [ Actually, if we had to be precise, we would have to read what's in
   STAR[31:0] and write it back unchanged on Intel and write 0 on AMD. I
   guess the current writing to 0 is still ok since Intel can apparently
   stomach it. ]

The resulting code is identical to what we have above:

  .loc 3 87 0
  xorl    %esi, %esi      # tmp104
  movl    $2293776, %eax  #, tmp103
  movl    $-1073741695, %ecx      #, tmp102
  movl    %esi, %edx      # tmp104, tmp104

  ...

        wrmsr

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 0bed416f8c40..105da8df87ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ void syscall_init(void)
 	 * They both write to the same internal register. STAR allows to
 	 * set CS/DS but only a 32bit target. LSTAR sets the 64bit rip.
 	 */
-	wrmsrl(MSR_STAR,  ((u64)__USER32_CS)<<48  | ((u64)__KERNEL_CS)<<32);
+	wrmsr(MSR_STAR, 0, (__USER32_CS << 16) | __KERNEL_CS);
 	wrmsrl(MSR_LSTAR, (unsigned long)entry_SYSCALL_64);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
-- 
2.3.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ