[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151123150303.GA26066@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:03:03 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@...org, jianchuan.wang@...driver.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, yang.shi@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore
migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang
> >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees.
> >
> > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt
>
> I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and
> everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is
> that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major
> kernel release.
Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt"
that's like to become stable over time.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists