| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:03:03 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com> To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...org, jianchuan.wang@...driver.com, tglx@...utronix.de, yang.shi@...driver.com Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees. > > > > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt > > I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and > everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is > that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major > kernel release. Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt" that's like to become stable over time. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists