linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 13/13] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device property API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151124110329.GJ1587@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:03:29 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/13] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device
 property API

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:53:06PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Mika, Andy: Was this one able to go separately? At least it builds without
> rest of the set but is there anything that could break DT based system if
> there are no patches 1-8/13?

As far as I can tell this should not break existing DT systems but I
have not been able to test myself since I don't have any DT systems
here.

> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/