[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151124114939.GI22980@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:49:39 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"igvt-g@...1.01.org" <igvt-g@...1.01.org>,
"Reddy, Raghuveer" <raghuveer.reddy@...el.com>,
"White, Michael L" <michael.l.white@...el.com>,
"Cowperthwaite, David J" <david.j.cowperthwaite@...el.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Li, Susie" <susie.li@...el.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"Zhou, Chao" <chao.zhou@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Zhu, Libo" <libo.zhu@...el.com>,
"Wang, Hongbo" <hongbo.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated
Graphics Passthrough Solution from Intel
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:19:18PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Downside: Tracking mapping changes on the guest side won't be any easier.
> This is mostly a problem for integrated gpus, since discrete ones usually
> require contiguous vram for scanout. I think saying "don't do that" is a
> valid option though, i.e. we're assuming that page mappings for a in-use
> scanout range never changes on the guest side. That is true for at least
> all the current linux drivers.
Apart from we already suffer limitations of fixed mappings and have patches
that want to change the page mapping of active scanouts.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists