[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151124115040.GK30089@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:50:40 -0500
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Crypto kernel tls socket
On (11/24/15 12:20), Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> There are some crypto acclerators out there so that putting tls into the
> kernel would give a net benefit, because otherwise user space has to
> copy data into the kernel for device access and back to user space until
> it can finally be send out on the wire.
>
> Since processors provide aesni and other crypto extensions as part of
> their instruction set architecture, this, of course, does not make sense
> any more.
BTW, that, exactly, was what happened to Solaris kssl.
--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists