linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPv3WKc+NA58=sxXe-YhUZvE9ca0q=ZC5L9WZOvAevuWZhAnYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:47:17 +0100
From:	Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Gregory Clément 
	<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>, nadavh@...vell.com,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
	Evan Wang <xswang@...vell.com>,
	Yair Mahalalel <myair@...vell.com>, nitroshift@...oo.com,
	Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements

Hi David,

Thanks for the remark. I will do the split and re-submit.

Best regards,
Marcin

2015-11-24 17:22 GMT+01:00 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>
> This patch series has a lot of problems.
>
> The worst one is that you are mixing bug fixes and new
> features/cleanups.
>
> You cannot do that.
>
> You _especially_ can't do that if you expect some of this stuff
> to be submitted to -stable too.
>
> Therefore you _must_ extract out the bug fixes, and submit those
> against 'net'.  And you must then wait for 'net' to be merged
> into 'net-next' before submitting the new feature patches.
>
> Furthermore, you should explicitly show what tree you are targetting
> your patches at, in your Subject lines.  In the form:
>
>         Subject: [PATCH $(TREE) N/M]
>
> Where $(TREE) is either 'net' or 'net-next'.
>
> THanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/