[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2705528.qSj27KAuDS@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:59:04 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: WEN Pingbo <pingbo.wen@...aro.org>
Cc: y2038@...ts.linaro.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
aksgarg1989@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] input: evdev: add new ioctl EVIOCSIFTYPE / EVIOCGIFTYPE
On Friday 27 November 2015 18:00:31 WEN Pingbo wrote:
> This patch depends on 'introduce new evdev interface'.
>
> Userspace cat set / get evdev interface type via the two ioctl
> commands. And default interface type is EV_IF_LEGACY, so the old binary
> will work normal with new kernel. Maybe we should change this default
> option to encourage people to move to new interface.
>
> And since all events are stored as input_value in evdev, there are no
> need to flush evdev_client's buffer if we change clk_type and if_type.
I would split out the change to evdev_set_clk_type into a separate patch.
> + case EVIOCSIFTYPE:
> + if (get_user(if_type, ip))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return evdev_set_if_type(client, if_type);
> + case EVIOCGIFTYPE:
> + return put_user(client->if_type, ip);
> }
This look asymmetric: EVIOCSIFTYPE uses a EVDEV_* constant, while
EVIOCGIFTYPE returns a EV_IF_* constant. Should those just
be the same constants anyway?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists