[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAp7Og2MPapOQmCSB9o4qwQHsA8_iyAWPhjHYPw6J=xCK2xew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:00:46 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...inux.com, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
ludovic.barre@...com, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote
processor using debugfs
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> This functionality is especially useful during the testing phase. When
> used in conjunction with Mailbox's Test Framework we can trivially conduct
> end-to-end testing i.e. boot co-processor, send and receive messages to
> the co-processor, then shut it down again (repeat as required).
>
I want this too!
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> index 9d30809..8113c18 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> @@ -88,8 +88,42 @@ static ssize_t rproc_state_read(struct file *filp, char __user *userbuf,
> return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, i);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t rproc_state_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *userbuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct rproc *rproc = filp->private_data;
> + char buf[10];
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (count > sizeof(buf))
> + return count;
> +
> + ret = copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, count);
> + if (ret)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (buf[count - 1] == '\n')
> + buf[count - 1] = '\0';
I believe you can get here with count = 0.
> +
> + if (!strncmp(buf, "start", count)) {
> + ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else if (!strncmp(buf, "stop", count)) {
> + rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
Unrecognized
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> static const struct file_operations rproc_state_ops = {
> .read = rproc_state_read,
> + .write = rproc_state_write,
> .open = simple_open,
> .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> };
Part of these nits
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists