[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151127202339.GA3746@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:23:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used
cpu_has_xx macros
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:13:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Given an appropriate long description for that config option, that seems
> worthwhile. Something like this:
>
> Some fast-paths in the kernel depend on the capabilities of the CPU.
> Say Y here for the kernel to patch in the appropriate code at runtime
> based on the capabilities of the CPU. The infrastructure for patching
> code at runtime takes up some additional space; space-constrained
> embedded systems may wish to say N here to produce smaller, slightly
> slower code.
Thanks for the text, looks good and I'll use it. :)
And yes, considering the size of the patch, it is really worthwhile to
save ~1.6K kernel text that easily.
I'll do a proper patch and run it through the build tests.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists