[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151201015615.GV64635@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:56:15 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] mtd: brcmnand: improve memory management
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:32:15PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> This patch addresses two related memory management issues in the probe
> function:
>
> 1. for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each
> iteration, so a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
>
> for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_put(child)
> when != e = child
> (
> return child;
> |
> + of_node_put(child);
> ? return ...;
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> 2. The devm_kzalloc'd data is not used if brcmnand_init_cs fails. Free it
> immediately, using devm_kfree in this case, instead of waiting for the
> remove function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
>
> v2: Drop of_node_get addition, as another patch will get rid of the need
> for it completely.
Pushed to l2-mtd.git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists