[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202093341.GM1593@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:33:41 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device
property API
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 02:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:33:51 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 20:58 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:11:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > What is the bug fix here described in the cover letter?
> > >
> > > The cover letter mentioned 'last part' which I refer to as patches
> > > 14,
> > > 15 (though this is for UART), and 16.
> >
> > Hmm.
> >
> > So may I assume that patches [1-13/16] are for me and the rest is to
> > be applied
> > by the other respective maintainers?
> >
> > That should be easiest logistically IMHO.
>
> Have no objections.
Unfortunately the patches (except this one) depend on each other so they
cannot be applied separately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists