linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device property API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151202095339.GC1555@katana>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:53:39 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device
 property API

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:33:41AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 02:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:33:51 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 20:58 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:11:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > > > What is the bug fix here described in the cover letter?
> > > > 
> > > > The cover letter mentioned 'last part' which I refer to as patches
> > > > 14,
> > > > 15 (though this is for UART), and 16.
> > > 
> > > Hmm.
> > > 
> > > So may I assume that patches [1-13/16] are for me and the rest is to
> > > be applied
> > > by the other respective maintainers?
> > > 
> > > That should be easiest logistically IMHO.
> > 
> > Have no objections.
> 
> Unfortunately the patches (except this one) depend on each other so they
> cannot be applied separately.

So, why not let all of them go in in one go?

For this patch:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)