linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:36:31 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:04:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/01/2015 10:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>>> This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
> >>>>> queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
> >>>>> spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> >>> One further enhancement would be to actually poll
> >>> the underlying device. This should be reasonably
> >>> straight-forward with macvtap (especially in the
> >>> passthrough mode).
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yes, it is. I have some patches to do this by replacing
> >> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.
> > We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.
> >
> >> Tests does not show
> >> any improvement but some regression.
> > Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
> > sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.
> 
> Yes I did. Probably something wrong elsewhere.

Is this for guest-to-guest? the patch to do napi
for tap is still not upstream due to minor performance
regression.  Want me to repost it?

> >
> >>  Maybe it's better to test macvtap.
> > Same thing ...
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/