[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202123654.GC4523@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:36:55 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, dingtianhong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to
enable/disable tracing
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:50:09PM +0800, Li Bin wrote:
> On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running
> system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back,
> because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which
> is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str
> instruction is single-copy atomic.
This commit message is misleading, since the single-copy atomicity
guarantees don't apply to the instruction-side. Instead, the architecture
calls out a handful of safe instructions in "Concurrent modification and
execution of instructions".
Now, those safe instructions *do* include NOP, B and BL, so that should
be sufficient for ftrace provided that we don't patch condition codes
(and I don't think we do).
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.18+
I don't think this is stable material.
Will
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> index c851be7..9669b33 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
> return ftrace_modify_code(pc, old, new, true);
> }
>
> +void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command)
> +{
> + ftrace_modify_all_code(command);
> +}
> +
> int __init ftrace_dyn_arch_init(void)
> {
> return 0;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists