[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202131659.GA5621@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:16:59 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, dingtianhong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to
enable/disable tracing
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:50:09PM +0800, Li Bin wrote:
> > On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running
> > system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back,
> > because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which
> > is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str
> > instruction is single-copy atomic.
>
> This commit message is misleading, since the single-copy atomicity
> guarantees don't apply to the instruction-side. Instead, the architecture
> calls out a handful of safe instructions in "Concurrent modification and
> execution of instructions".
>
> Now, those safe instructions *do* include NOP, B and BL, so that should
> be sufficient for ftrace provided that we don't patch condition codes
> (and I don't think we do).
Thinking about this some more, you also need to fix the validate=1 case
in ftrace_modify_code so that it can run outside of stop_machine. We
currently rely on that to deal with concurrent modifications (e.g.
module unloading).
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists