[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202184330.GH64635@google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:43:30 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: tony@...mide.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, javier@...hile0.org, fcooper@...com,
nsekhar@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND
on non-OMAP platforms
Hi Roger,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:42:12AM +0530, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 02/12/15 08:56, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:41:16PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> On 30/11/15 21:54, Brian Norris wrote:
> >>> But anyway, I'm not sure that completely answered my question. My
> >>> question was whether you were removing the irqchip code solely for
> >>> performance reasons, or are there others?
> >>
> >> Yes. Only for performance reasons.
> >
> > Hmm, that's not my favorite answer. I'd prefer that more analysis was
> > done here before scrapping irqchip...
>
> I agree. We could retain the irqchip model till we have more satisfying
> analysis.
I won't insist, though if it's not too ugly/horrible to do so, I think
that would make sense. I'll leave it as your call.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists