linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Use different cachelines for readers and writers of load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <565F3C22.8060405@hpe.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:44:50 -0500
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Use different cachelines for readers
 and writers of load_avg

On 12/01/2015 03:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:00:35PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> I think the current kernel use power-of-2 kmemcaches to satisfy kalloc()
>> requests except when the size is less than or equal to 192 where there are
>> some non-power-of-2 kmemcaches available. Given that the task_group
>> structure is large enough with FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled, we shouldn't hit
>> the case that the allocated buffer is not cacheline aligned.
> Using out-of-object storage is allowed (none of the existing sl*b
> allocators do so iirc).
>
> That is, its perfectly valid for a sl*b allocator for 64 byte objects to
> allocate 72 bytes for each object and use the 'spare' 8 bytes for object
> tracking or whatnot.
>
> That would respect the minimum alignment guarantee of 8 bytes but not
> provide the 'expected' object size alignment you're assuming.
>
> Also, we have the proper interfaces to request the explicit alignment
> for a reason. So if you need the alignment for correctness, use those.

Thanks for the tip. I have just sent out an updated patch set which 
create a cache-aligned memcache for task group. That should work under 
all kernel config setting.

Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/