[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVPrhXqqPP-7DMF6YHrBacm-tWBrSweF3_bZ7oPH5gsig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:59:28 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Skylake (XPS 13 9350) TSC is way off
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:42 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:38 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> In case it's at all useful, adjtimex -p says:
>>>
>>> mode: 0
>>> offset: 0
>>> frequency: 135641
>>> maxerror: 37498
>>> esterror: 1532
>>> status: 8192
>>> time_constant: 2
>>> precision: 1
>>> tolerance: 32768000
>>> tick: 10000
>>> raw time: 1449098317s 671243180us = 1449098317.671243180
>>>
>>> this suggests a rather small correction, so I really have no idea what
>>> "Adjusting tsc more than 11% (8039115 vs 7759462)" means.
>>>
>>> John, you wrote this code. What does the error message mean?
>
> Also, is there a behavior issue you're seeing or is this just a
> concern about the warning? I assumed it was the first, but digging up
> the thread here I'm not sure I see any specific problems listed.
No, there's no actual problem I'm aware of other than the error
message. Skylake's TSC is different from other chips, and this is
Skylake, and I was worried that something was wrong with the initial
calibration. It seems like the initial calibration may be fine,
though.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists