linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151202235948.GA1751@lunn.ch>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:59:48 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Benjamin Cama <benoar@...ka.fr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Detlef Vollmann <dv@...lmann.ch>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform

> > I agree. We have multiplatform dove already, it is in mach-mvebu. Do
> > we really need both mach-dove and mach-mvebu dove in one kernel?
> 
> I'm also fine with deleting mach-dove.

Ah, maybe i worded that badly. By "in one kernel" i mean kernel
binary. We should keep mach-dove, and allow a mach-dove build of the
kernel. But there is no reason for that build to be multi-platform. We
already have multi-platform dove via mvebu.

Anyway, i see your v2 patches do leave mach-dove as a single platform
kernel.

	Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/