[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203131648.GA2460@fixme-laptop>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:16:48 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@....net, mhocko@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
will.deacon@....com, waiman.long@....com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:40:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
> + *
> + * CPU0 (schedule) CPU1 (try_to_wake_up) CPU2 (schedule)
> + *
> + * LOCK rq(0)->lock LOCK X->pi_lock
> + * dequeue X
> + * sched-out X
> + * smp_store_release(X->on_cpu, 0);
> + *
> + * smp_cond_acquire(!X->on_cpu);
> + * X->state = WAKING
> + * set_task_cpu(X,2)
> + *
> + * LOCK rq(2)->lock
> + * enqueue X
> + * X->state = RUNNING
> + * UNLOCK rq(2)->lock
> + *
> + * LOCK rq(2)->lock // orders against CPU1
> + * sched-out Z
> + * sched-in X
> + * UNLOCK rq(1)->lock
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is a typo, right? Should be "UNLOCK rq(2)->lock".
Regards,
Boqun
> + *
> + * UNLOCK X->pi_lock
> + * UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
> + *
> + *
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists