[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203144909.GB27463@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:49:09 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: implement lockup detector
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:28:39PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
> +void touch_workqueue_watchdog(int cpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * If not explicitly touched, these stamps are never updated, which
> + * means that they may affect stall detection if jiffies wraps;
> + * however, it's highly unlikely and the worst that can happen is
> + * delaying stall detection by upto one threshold duration.
> + */
Oops, this comment is stale. Updated the code but forgot to drop it.
Will remove in the next iteration.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists