linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: introduce touch_softlockup_watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151203150442.GR17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:04:42 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: introduce touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched()

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:48:11AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> We can add MEM_RECLAIM -> !MEM_RECLAIM warning mechanism in addition
> but I think adding stall detection is justified.

Sure, a stall mech is always nice, but I was thinking we should be able
to better catch some of these with explicit stuff.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/