| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5660974D.7050006@hpe.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:26:05 -0500
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To: bsegall@...gle.com
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: Move hot load_avg into its own cacheline
On 12/02/2015 03:02 PM, bsegall@...gle.com wrote:
> Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@....com> writes:
>
>> If a system with large number of sockets was driven to full
>> utilization, it was found that the clock tick handling occupied a
>> rather significant proportion of CPU time when fair group scheduling
>> and autogroup were enabled.
>>
>> Running a java benchmark on a 16-socket IvyBridge-EX system, the perf
>> profile looked like:
>>
>> 10.52% 0.00% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] smp_apic_timer_interrupt
>> 9.66% 0.05% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] hrtimer_interrupt
>> 8.65% 0.03% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] tick_sched_timer
>> 8.56% 0.00% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_process_times
>> 8.07% 0.03% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] scheduler_tick
>> 6.91% 1.78% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] task_tick_fair
>> 5.24% 5.04% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_shares
>>
>> In particular, the high CPU time consumed by update_cfs_shares()
>> was mostly due to contention on the cacheline that contained the
>> task_group's load_avg statistical counter. This cacheline may also
>> contains variables like shares, cfs_rq& se which are accessed rather
>> frequently during clock tick processing.
>>
>> This patch moves the load_avg variable into another cacheline
>> separated from the other frequently accessed variables. It also
>> creates a cacheline aligned kmemcache for task_group to make sure
>> that all the allocated task_group's are cacheline aligned.
>>
>> By doing so, the perf profile became:
>>
>> 9.44% 0.00% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] smp_apic_timer_interrupt
>> 8.74% 0.01% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] hrtimer_interrupt
>> 7.83% 0.03% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] tick_sched_timer
>> 7.74% 0.00% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_process_times
>> 7.27% 0.03% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] scheduler_tick
>> 5.94% 1.74% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] task_tick_fair
>> 4.15% 3.92% java [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_shares
>>
>> The %cpu time is still pretty high, but it is better than before. The
>> benchmark results before and after the patch was as follows:
>>
>> Before patch - Max-jOPs: 907533 Critical-jOps: 134877
>> After patch - Max-jOPs: 916011 Critical-jOps: 142366
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@....com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 7 ++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 4d568ac..e39204f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -7331,6 +7331,11 @@ int in_sched_functions(unsigned long addr)
>> */
>> struct task_group root_task_group;
>> LIST_HEAD(task_groups);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>> +/* Cacheline aligned slab cache for task_group */
>> +static struct kmem_cache *task_group_cache __read_mostly;
>> +#endif
>> #endif
>>
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
>> @@ -7356,6 +7361,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>> root_task_group.cfs_rq = (struct cfs_rq **)ptr;
>> ptr += nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **);
>>
>> + task_group_cache = KMEM_CACHE(task_group, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN);
> The KMEM_CACHE macro suggests instead adding
> ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp to the struct definition instead.
The main goal is to have the load_avg placed in a new cacheline
separated from the read-only fields above. That is why I placed
____cacheline_aligned after load_avg. I omitted the in_smp part because
it is in the SMP block already. Putting ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp
won't guarantee alignment of any field within the structure.
I have done some test and having ____cacheline_aligned inside the
structure has the same effect of forcing the whole structure in the
cacheline aligned boundary.
>> #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
>> root_task_group.rt_se = (struct sched_rt_entity **)ptr;
>> @@ -7668,12 +7674,38 @@ void set_curr_task(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>> /* task_group_lock serializes the addition/removal of task groups */
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Make sure that the task_group structure is cacheline aligned when
>> + * fair group scheduling is enabled.
>> + */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>> +static inline struct task_group *alloc_task_group(void)
>> +{
>> + return kmem_cache_alloc(task_group_cache, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void free_task_group(struct task_group *tg)
>> +{
>> + kmem_cache_free(task_group_cache, tg);
>> +}
>> +#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>> +static inline struct task_group *alloc_task_group(void)
>> +{
>> + return kzalloc(sizeof(struct task_group), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void free_task_group(struct task_group *tg)
>> +{
>> + kfree(tg);
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>> +
>> static void free_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
>> {
>> free_fair_sched_group(tg);
>> free_rt_sched_group(tg);
>> autogroup_free(tg);
>> - kfree(tg);
>> + free_task_group(tg);
>> }
>>
>> /* allocate runqueue etc for a new task group */
>> @@ -7681,7 +7713,7 @@ struct task_group *sched_create_group(struct task_group *parent)
>> {
>> struct task_group *tg;
>>
>> - tg = kzalloc(sizeof(*tg), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + tg = alloc_task_group();
>> if (!tg)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> index efd3bfc..e679895 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> @@ -248,7 +248,12 @@ struct task_group {
>> unsigned long shares;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> - atomic_long_t load_avg;
>> + /*
>> + * load_avg can be heavily contended at clock tick time, so put
>> + * it in its own cacheline separated from the fields above which
>> + * will also be accessed at each tick.
>> + */
>> + atomic_long_t load_avg ____cacheline_aligned;
>> #endif
>> #endif
> I suppose the question is if it would be better to just move this to
> wind up on a separate cacheline without the extra empty space, though it
> would likely be more fragile and unclear.
I have been thinking about that too. The problem is anything that will
be in the same cacheline as load_avg and have to be accessed at clock
click time will cause the same contention problem. In the current
layout, the fields after load_avg are the rt stuff as well some list
head structure and pointers. The rt stuff should be kind of mutually
exclusive of the CFS load_avg in term of usage. The list head structure
and pointers don't seem to be that frequently accessed. So it is the
right place to start a new cacheline boundary.
Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists