lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56609956.3030201@hpe.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:34:46 -0500
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: Move hot load_avg into its own cacheline

On 12/02/2015 11:32 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:41 -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> By doing so, the perf profile became:
>>
>>     9.44%   0.00%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] smp_apic_timer_interrupt
>>     8.74%   0.01%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] hrtimer_interrupt
>>     7.83%   0.03%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] tick_sched_timer
>>     7.74%   0.00%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_process_times
>>     7.27%   0.03%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] scheduler_tick
>>     5.94%   1.74%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] task_tick_fair
>>     4.15%   3.92%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_cfs_shares
>>
>> The %cpu time is still pretty high, but it is better than before.
> Is that with the box booted skew_tick=1?
>
> 	-Mike
>

I haven't tried that kernel parameter. I will try it to see if it can 
improve the situation. BTW, will there be other undesirable side effects 
of using this other than the increased power consumption as said in the 
kernel-parameters.txt file?

Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ