[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <566106B8.7080205@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:21:28 +0800
From: xuejiancheng <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
<zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
<yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com>, <yanghongwei@...ilicon.com>,
<suwenping@...ilicon.com>, <ml.yang@...ilicon.com>,
<gaofei@...ilicon.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] clk: hi3519: add dt-binding document and header
file
Hi Arnd,
On 2015/12/3 17:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 December 2015 10:39:24 Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>> +#ifndef __DTS_HI3519_CLOCK_H
>> +#define __DTS_HI3519_CLOCK_H
>
> Please try to avoid adding headers like this if you can at all.
>
> I might ask you to merge the header file in one merge window
> otherwise and submit the platform code one kernel later, as they
> tendn to cause us needless dependencies otherwise.
>
Sorry. In v1, Rob suggested putting binding doc and header files in
a separate patch. The clock driver indeed depends on the header.
I will put the header and the clock driver in a patch, and keep the
binding doc in another patch.
>
>> +/* fixed rate */
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_400M 1
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_200M 2
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_125M 3
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_150M 4
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_75M 5
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_300M 6
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_50M 7
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_24M 8
>> +#define HI3519_FIXED_3M 9
>> +
>> +/* mux clocks */
>> +#define HI3519_FMC_MUX 32
>> +#define HI3519_I2C_MUX 33
>> +#define HI3519_UART_MUX 34
>> +#define HI3519_SYSAXI_MUX 35
>> +
>> +/*fixed factor clocks*/
>> +#define HI3519_SYSAPB_CLK 64
>> +
>> +/* gate clocks */
>> +#define HI3519_FMC_CLK 129
>> +#define HI3519_UART0_CLK 153
>> +#define HI3519_UART1_CLK 154
>> +#define HI3519_UART2_CLK 155
>> +#define HI3519_UART3_CLK 156
>> +#define HI3519_UART4_CLK 157
>
> Where do those numbers come from? They are not consecutive, so it sounds
> like they are directly from the data sheet and won't be needed in the driver.
> If that's true, just use the numbers directly, as you do for everything
> else.
The numbers are defined by myself, not directly from the data sheet. Some numbers
are reserved for device nodes which will be added later. So they are not consecutive now.
>
>> +#define HI3519_NR_CLKS 256
>> +#define HI3519_NR_RSTS 256
>>
> These seem to not be needed at all.
These are used in drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3519.c.
>
> Arnd
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists