[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21651844.ONg7WdRZpk@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:56:52 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: xuejiancheng <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
xuwei5@...ilicon.com, haojian.zhuang@...aro.org,
zhangfei.gao@...aro.org, bintian.wang@...wei.com,
yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com, yanghongwei@...ilicon.com,
suwenping@...ilicon.com, ml.yang@...ilicon.com,
gaofei@...ilicon.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] clk: hi3519: add dt-binding document and header file
On Friday 04 December 2015 11:21:28 xuejiancheng wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 2015/12/3 17:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 December 2015 10:39:24 Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> >> +#ifndef __DTS_HI3519_CLOCK_H
> >> +#define __DTS_HI3519_CLOCK_H
> >
> > Please try to avoid adding headers like this if you can at all.
> >
> > I might ask you to merge the header file in one merge window
> > otherwise and submit the platform code one kernel later, as they
> > tendn to cause us needless dependencies otherwise.
> >
>
> Sorry. In v1, Rob suggested putting binding doc and header files in
> a separate patch. The clock driver indeed depends on the header.
>
> I will put the header and the clock driver in a patch, and keep the
> binding doc in another patch.
Having split patches is better, I was really commenting on the fact
that ideally you would not have a header file at all. If we merge
the header through arm-soc, then you won't be able to merge the
clk driver easily, and if you merge the header through the clk
maintainer, I'm can't take your dts files.
> >> +/* fixed rate */
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_400M 1
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_200M 2
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_125M 3
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_150M 4
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_75M 5
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_300M 6
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_50M 7
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_24M 8
> >> +#define HI3519_FIXED_3M 9
> >> +
> >> +/* mux clocks */
> >> +#define HI3519_FMC_MUX 32
> >> +#define HI3519_I2C_MUX 33
> >> +#define HI3519_UART_MUX 34
> >> +#define HI3519_SYSAXI_MUX 35
> >> +
> >> +/*fixed factor clocks*/
> >> +#define HI3519_SYSAPB_CLK 64
> >> +
> >> +/* gate clocks */
> >> +#define HI3519_FMC_CLK 129
> >> +#define HI3519_UART0_CLK 153
> >> +#define HI3519_UART1_CLK 154
> >> +#define HI3519_UART2_CLK 155
> >> +#define HI3519_UART3_CLK 156
> >> +#define HI3519_UART4_CLK 157
> >
> > Where do those numbers come from? They are not consecutive, so it sounds
> > like they are directly from the data sheet and won't be needed in the driver.
> > If that's true, just use the numbers directly, as you do for everything
> > else.
>
> The numbers are defined by myself, not directly from the data sheet. Some numbers
> are reserved for device nodes which will be added later. So they are not consecutive now.
I don't understand. How do you decide which numbers to reserve? If the
numbers are completely arbitrary and you have no idea what other clocks
there are, you can simply have consecutive numbers here and do the driver
accordingly.
If the numbers actually have a real meaning, then you either don't need them
at all, or you could just put all numbers in there that you would eventually need.
> >> +#define HI3519_NR_CLKS 256
> >> +#define HI3519_NR_RSTS 256
> >>
> > These seem to not be needed at all.
>
> These are used in drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3519.c.
Then move them there. Anything that is not needed by *both* the driver and
the dts files doesn't belong in here.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists