[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151204073437.GA24827@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:34:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add __GFP_ZERO to alloc_cpumask_var_node() if ptr
is zero
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:05:12 +1030
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> > This is clever, but I would advise against such subtle code. We will never be
> > able to remove this code once it is in.
> >
> > Would suggest making the non-CPUMASK_OFFSTACK stubs write garbage into the
> > cpumasks instead, iff !(flags & __GFP_ZERO).
>
> I actually thought of the same thing, but thought it was a bit harsh. If others
> think that's a better solution, then I'll submit a patch to do that.
That just makes things more fragile - 'garbage' will spread the breakage, and if
the breakage is subtle, it will spread subtle breakage.
So why not use a kzmalloc_node() [equivalent] call instead of kmalloc_node(), to
make sure it's all zeroed instead of uninitialized?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists