linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add __GFP_ZERO to alloc_cpumask_var

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151203213745.52f21886@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:37:45 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add __GFP_ZERO to alloc_cpumask_var_node() if ptr
 is zero

On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:05:12 +1030
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> This is clever, but I would advise against such subtle code.  We will
> never be able to remove this code once it is in.
> 
> Would suggest making the non-CPUMASK_OFFSTACK stubs write garbage into
> the cpumasks instead, iff !(flags & __GFP_ZERO).
> 
>
I actually thought of the same thing, but thought it was a bit harsh.
If others think that's a better solution, then I'll submit a patch to
do that.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/