linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:40:32 -0500
From:	Philip Elcan <pelcan@...eaurora.org>
To:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.org>,
	Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table


On 12/03/2015 09:14 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 03/12/15 15:48, Philip Elcan wrote:
>> This allows setting an SDHC controller as non-removable
>> by using the _RMV method in the ACPI table. It doesn't
> Is that _RMV on the host controller?  Shouldn't it be on the card i.e. child
> device node?

Yes, this is on the host controller. The ACPI table only describes the
host controller, not the child nodes.

>
>> mark it as non-removable if GPIO card detection is
>> already setup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Elcan <pelcan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/