[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5665438B.10104@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:30:03 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Philip Elcan <pelcan@...eaurora.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.org>,
Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table
On 04/12/15 17:40, Philip Elcan wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2015 09:14 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 03/12/15 15:48, Philip Elcan wrote:
>>> This allows setting an SDHC controller as non-removable
>>> by using the _RMV method in the ACPI table. It doesn't
>> Is that _RMV on the host controller? Shouldn't it be on the card i.e. child
>> device node?
>
> Yes, this is on the host controller. The ACPI table only describes the
> host controller, not the child nodes.
>
If you look at Intel devices, the _RMV is on the child e.g.
Device (SDHA)
{
Name (_HID, "80860F14") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CID, "PNP0D40") // _CID: Compatible ID
Name (_DDN, "Intel(R) eMMC Controller - 80860F14") // _DDN: DOS Device Name
...
Device (EMMD)
{
...
Method (_RMV, 0, NotSerialized) // _RMV: Removal Status
{
Return (Zero)
}
}
}
I am not an ACPI expert but that seems like the correct place for it.
>>
>>> mark it as non-removable if GPIO card detection is
>>> already setup.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Elcan <pelcan@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists