[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151204200355.GH3624@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 14:03:55 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] fuse: Support fuse filesystems outside of
init_user_ns
Quoting Seth Forshee (seth.forshee@...onical.com):
> Update fuse to translate uids and gids to/from the user namspace
> of the process servicing requests on /dev/fuse. Any ids which do
> not map into the namespace will result in errors. inodes will
> also be marked bad when unmappable ids are received from the
> userspace fuse process.
>
> Currently no use cases are known for letting the userspace fuse
> daemon switch namespaces after opening /dev/fuse. Given this
> fact, and in order to keep the implementation as simple as
> possible and ease security auditing, the user namespace from
> which /dev/fuse is opened is used for all id translations. This
> is required to be the same namespace as s_user_ns to maintain
> behavior consistent with other filesystems which can be mounted
> in user namespaces.
>
> For cuse the namespace used for the connection is also simply
> current_user_ns() at the time /dev/cuse is opened.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
> ---
> fs/fuse/cuse.c | 3 +-
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 13 +++++----
> fs/fuse/dir.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 14 ++++++----
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 5 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/cuse.c b/fs/fuse/cuse.c
> index eae2c11268bc..a10aca57bfe4 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/cuse.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/cuse.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> #include <linux/stat.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/uio.h>
> +#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
>
> #include "fuse_i.h"
>
> @@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ static int cuse_channel_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> if (!cc)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - fuse_conn_init(&cc->fc);
> + fuse_conn_init(&cc->fc, current_user_ns());
>
> fud = fuse_dev_alloc(&cc->fc);
> if (!fud) {
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> index a4f6f30d6d86..11b4cb0a0e2f 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> @@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ static void __fuse_put_request(struct fuse_req *req)
>
> static void fuse_req_init_context(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
> {
> - req->in.h.uid = from_kuid_munged(&init_user_ns, current_fsuid());
> - req->in.h.gid = from_kgid_munged(&init_user_ns, current_fsgid());
> + req->in.h.uid = from_kuid(fc->user_ns, current_fsuid());
> + req->in.h.gid = from_kgid(fc->user_ns, current_fsgid());
> req->in.h.pid = pid_nr_ns(task_pid(current), fc->pid_ns);
> }
>
> @@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ static struct fuse_req *__fuse_get_req(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned npages,
> __set_bit(FR_WAITING, &req->flags);
> if (for_background)
> __set_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags);
> - if (req->in.h.pid == 0) {
> + if (req->in.h.pid == 0 || req->in.h.uid == (uid_t)-1 ||
> + req->in.h.gid == (gid_t)-1) {
> fuse_put_request(fc, req);
> return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW);
> }
> @@ -1248,7 +1249,8 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_do_read(struct fuse_dev *fud, struct file *file,
> struct fuse_in *in;
> unsigned reqsize;
>
> - if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != fc->pid_ns)
> + if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != fc->pid_ns ||
> + current_user_ns() != fc->user_ns)
Do you think this should be using current_in_user_ns(fc->user_ns) ?
Opening a file, forking (maybe unsharing) then acting on the file is
pretty standard fare which this would break.
(same for pidns, i guess, as well as for write below)
> return -EIO;
>
> restart:
> @@ -1880,7 +1882,8 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_do_write(struct fuse_dev *fud,
> struct fuse_req *req;
> struct fuse_out_header oh;
>
> - if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != fc->pid_ns)
> + if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != fc->pid_ns ||
> + current_user_ns() != fc->user_ns)
> return -EIO;
>
> if (nbytes < sizeof(struct fuse_out_header))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists