lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:05:28 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc:	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] fs: Permit FIBMAP for users with CAP_SYS_RAWIO in
 s_user_ns

The fact that we need CAP_SYS_RAIO for FIBMAP is pretty silly, given
that FIEMAP does not require privileges --- and in fact the preferred
interface.  Why not just simply drop the requirement for privileges
for FIBMAP?

(Seth, Serge, this isn't a real objection to your patch; but the fact
that FIBMAP requires root has always been a bit silly, and this would
be a great opportunity to simplify things a bit.)

						- Ted
						

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 01:11:43PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Seth Forshee (seth.forshee@...onical.com):
> > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> > index 5d01d2638ca5..45c371bed7ee 100644
> > --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ioctl_fibmap(struct file *filp, int __user *p)
> >  	/* do we support this mess? */
> >  	if (!mapping->a_ops->bmap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > -	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > +	if (!ns_capable(filp->f_inode->i_sb->s_user_ns, CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> >  		return -EPERM;
> >  	res = get_user(block, p);
> >  	if (res)
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ