[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWLURXVQNbTv4O9znB-dEH5_kFgPbTYuR5TgOcaDNrSJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 12:09:41 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: fix build failure
Hi Sudip
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> We are having build failure with next-20151202 for sparc allmodconfig
> with the error messages:
> undefined reference to 'of_io_request_and_map'
>
> CONFIG_OF is defined for sparc so it is expected that we have a
> definition of of_io_request_and_map() but of/address.c is only compiled
> if it is !SPARC.
No, it's compiled depending on CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS...
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> ---
>
> build log is at:
> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/94541627
>
> patch has been build tested with sparc allmodconfig and x86_64
> allmodconfig.
>
> include/linux/of_address.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h
> index 507daad..7bf4603 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_address.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
> @@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ static inline bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np)
> extern int of_address_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index,
> struct resource *r);
> void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *node, int index);
> -void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *device,
> - int index, const char *name);
> #else
>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -136,6 +134,19 @@ static inline void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *device,
> }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARC)
... hence wouldn't it be better to use "#ifdef CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS" instead?
> +void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *device,
> + int index, const char *name);
> +#else
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +
> +static inline void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *device,
> + int index, const char *name)
> +{
> + return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF && !CONFIG_SPARC */
> +
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists