[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151207063634.GD4122@sudip-pc>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:06:34 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: fix build failure
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:09:41PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Sudip
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> > We are having build failure with next-20151202 for sparc allmodconfig
> > with the error messages:
> > undefined reference to 'of_io_request_and_map'
> >
> > CONFIG_OF is defined for sparc so it is expected that we have a
> > definition of of_io_request_and_map() but of/address.c is only compiled
> > if it is !SPARC.
>
> No, it's compiled depending on CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS...
yes, ofcourse. I did it looking at:
config OF_ADDRESS
def_bool y
depends on !SPARC && HAS_IOMEM
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
<snip>
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARC)
>
> ... hence wouldn't it be better to use "#ifdef CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS" instead?
>
I will test with today's next and send v2.
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists