[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56652912.80308@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:37:06 +0800
From: xuejiancheng <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <khilman@...aro.org>, <olof@...om.net>,
<xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
<zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
<suwenping@...ilicon.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com>,
<gaofei@...ilicon.com>, <ml.yang@...ilicon.com>,
<yanghongwei@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] ARM: dts: add dts files for hi3519-demb board
On 2015/12/4 18:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 04 December 2015 10:27:58 xuejiancheng wrote:
>>>
>>>> + sysctrl: system-controller@...20000 {
>>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,sysctrl";
>>>> + reg = <0x12020000 0x1000>;
>>>> + reboot-offset = <0x4>;
>>>> + };
>>>
>>> Is this one identical to the one in hip04?
>>>
>>> If not, pick a new unique compatible string
>>
>> Yes. It's compatible with the one in hip04.
>
> Ok, we should add a compatible string for that then, as the hip04 apparently
> has a slightly different layout from hip01.
>
> Can you add a separate patch to clarify the existing hisilicon,sysctrl nodes?
>
> It look like hi3620 accidentally uses the same string as hip04 already
> but is actually a bit different.
>
> Maybe split out the sysctrl binding from
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt, as it has
> you already have a couple of those, and it's not clear how they relate
> to one another.
>
> If we introduce a string for all hip04 compatible sysctrl devices, we should
> document that and use it consistently, so hi3519 becomes
>
> compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl", "hisilicon,hip04-sysctrl", "hisilicon,sysctrl";
>
> but I'd clarify in the binding documentation that "hisilicon,sysctrl" should
> only be used for hip04 and hi3519 but not the others.
>
> As this seems to be a standard part, we can also think about making a
> high-level driver for in in drivers/soc rather than relying on the syscon
> driver which we tend to use more for one-off devices with random register
> layouts.
>
Sorry. I didn't understand your meaning well and maybe I gave you a wrong description.
Please allow me to clarify it again.
The "sysctrl" nodes here is just used for the "reboot" function. It is corresponding to
the driver "drivers/power/reset/hisi-reboot.c". The compatible string in the driver is
"hisilicon,sysctrl".
The layout of this block is also different from the one in HiP04.
>>>> +
>>>> + crg: crg@...10000 {
>>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-crg";
>>>
>>>
>>> what is a "crg"? Is there a standard name for these?
>>
>> The "crg" means Clock and Reset Generator. It's a block which supplies clock
>> and reset signals for other modules in the chip. I used "hi3519-clock"
>> in last version patch. Rob Herring suggested that it's better to use "hi3519-crg"
>> as the compatible string if it's a whole block.
>>
>> what about writing like this?
>>
>> crg: clock-reset-controller@...10000 {
>> compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-crg";
>> }
>>
>
> Ok, that's better.
>
> Arnd
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists