lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGuM2+L=TcQXxRhHAJmgLjGzMHJbWP=Kw33myWAdRLJEDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:55:06 -0500
From:	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Archit,
>>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
>>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
>>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
>>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
>>> reproduce:
>>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>          make ARCH=x86_64
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>       if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
>>
>> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
>> depend on CONFIG_OF?
>
> Please don't.

I assume you are not using of_mipi_dsi_device_add()?  We could just
put this one fxn inside #ifdef CONFIG_OF / #endif, I think..

BR,
-R

> BR,
> Jani.
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ