[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39F7CF67@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:59:58 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch V2] x86, mce: Ensure offline CPU's don't participate in
mce rendezvous process.
> No, the system did panic in both times. The "strange" observation is
> that the MCE gets reported only on the cores on node 0. Or at least only
> the printks from mce_panic() on the cores on node0 reach the serial
> console.
You only see messages and logs from node0, because the cpus there are
the only ones that see any errors logged in their banks.
The cpus on node 1, 2, 3 scan all banks and find nothing, so say nothing.
There are no system-wide banks ... just core-wide (in recent generations
banks 0-3) and socket-wide (banks >=4). But don't code those numbers
into any generic code ... we will change them sooner or later.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists