linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] workqueue: implement lockup detector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151208160054.GD230987@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:00:54 -0500
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] workqueue: implement lockup detector

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:39:52PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:38:16PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:06:17PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Decoupled the control knobs from softlockup.  It's now workqueue
> > > module param which can be updated at runtime.  If there's no
> > > objection, I'll push the two patches through wq/for-4.5.
> > 
> > Does this still compile correctly with CONFIG_WQ_WATCHDOG disabled?
> 
> Yeah and if some config combo breaks I'm gonna catch it while it goes
> through wq tree.

I think I am fine with this approach.

Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>

Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/