[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151208163148.GE30240@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:31:48 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] workqueue: implement lockup detector
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:00:54AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:39:52PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:38:16PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:06:17PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Decoupled the control knobs from softlockup. It's now workqueue
> > > > module param which can be updated at runtime. If there's no
> > > > objection, I'll push the two patches through wq/for-4.5.
> > >
> > > Does this still compile correctly with CONFIG_WQ_WATCHDOG disabled?
> >
> > Yeah and if some config combo breaks I'm gonna catch it while it goes
> > through wq tree.
>
> I think I am fine with this approach.
>
> Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Applied the two patches to wq/for-4.5.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists