linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] r8152: fix lockup when runtime PM is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F8D48F@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:18:59 +0000
From:	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	Peter Wu <peter@...ensteyn.nl>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] r8152: fix lockup when runtime PM is enabled

Peter Wu [mailto:peter@...ensteyn.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 12:59 AM
[...]
> +			if (tp->netdev->flags & IFF_UP) {

Maybe you could just replace the checking of netif_running(tp->netdev) with this.

Excuse me. I have a question. Before the open() is finished, the netif_running() would
be true, but the IFF_UP wouldn't be set. Is it right?

Best Regards,
Hayes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/