Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:54:51 +0800
From:	xuejiancheng <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <khilman@...aro.org>, <olof@...om.net>,
	<xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
	<zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
	<suwenping@...ilicon.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com>,
	<gaofei@...ilicon.com>, <ml.yang@...ilicon.com>,
	<yanghongwei@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] ARM: dts: add dts files for hi3519-demb board



On 2015/12/7 14:37, xuejiancheng wrote:
> 
> On 2015/12/4 18:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Friday 04 December 2015 10:27:58 xuejiancheng wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +            sysctrl: system-controller@...20000 {
>>>>> +                    compatible = "hisilicon,sysctrl";
>>>>> +                    reg = <0x12020000 0x1000>;
>>>>> +                    reboot-offset = <0x4>;
>>>>> +            };
>>>>
>>>> Is this one identical to the one in hip04?
>>>>
>>>> If not, pick a new unique compatible string
>>>
>>> Yes. It's compatible with the one in hip04.
>>
>> Ok, we should add a compatible string for that then, as the hip04 apparently
>> has a slightly different layout from hip01.
>>
>> Can you add a separate patch to clarify the existing hisilicon,sysctrl nodes?
>>
>> It look like hi3620 accidentally uses the same string as hip04 already
>> but is actually a bit different.
>>
>> Maybe split out the sysctrl binding from
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt, as it has
>> you already have a couple of those, and it's not clear how they relate
>> to one another.
>>
>> If we introduce a string for all hip04 compatible sysctrl devices, we should
>> document that and use it consistently, so hi3519 becomes
>>
>> 	compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl", "hisilicon,hip04-sysctrl", "hisilicon,sysctrl";
>>
>> but I'd clarify in the binding documentation that "hisilicon,sysctrl" should
>> only be used for hip04 and hi3519 but not the others.
>>
>> As this seems to be a standard part, we can also think about making a
>> high-level driver for in in drivers/soc rather than relying on the syscon
>> driver which we tend to use more for one-off devices with random register
>> layouts.
>>
>    Sorry. I didn't understand your meaning well and maybe I gave you a wrong description.
> Please allow me to clarify it again.
>    The "sysctrl" nodes here is just used for the "reboot" function. It is corresponding to
> the driver "drivers/power/reset/hisi-reboot.c". The compatible string in the driver is
> "hisilicon,sysctrl".
>    The layout of this block is also different from the one in HiP04.

I'll use "syscon" as the compatible value for sysctrl node and "syscon-reboot" for a new reboot node.

Thank you.

> 
>>>>> +
>>>>> +            crg: crg@...10000 {
>>>>> +                    compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-crg";
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> what is a "crg"? Is there a standard name for these?
>>>
>>> The "crg" means Clock and Reset Generator. It's a block which supplies clock
>>> and reset signals for other modules in the chip. I used "hi3519-clock"
>>> in last version patch. Rob Herring suggested that it's better to use "hi3519-crg"
>>> as the compatible string if it's a whole block.
>>>
>>> what about writing like this？
>>>
>>> crg: clock-reset-controller@...10000 {
>>>         compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-crg";
>>>         }
>>>
>>
>> Ok, that's better.
>>
>> 	Arnd
>>
>> .
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists