[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i0qc7EsvkLtdnMvPbqiFiD9P28EkaEKq1T2syjuz+P=KozRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:20:06 +0200
From: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@...il.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 December 2015 17:32:02 John Stultz wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Bjorn Andersson
>> <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue 08 Dec 13:29 PST 2015, John Stultz wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
>> >> index 5183d18..ee5dcb7 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
>> >> @@ -282,6 +282,15 @@
>> >> };
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> + reboot_reason: reboot_reason@...3f65c {
>> >> + compatible = "reboot_reason";
>> >> + reg = <0x2A03F65C 0x4>;
>> >> + reason,none = <0x77665501>;
>> >> + reason,bootloader = <0x77665500>;
>> >> + reason,recovery = <0x77665502>;
>> >> + reason,oem = <0x6f656d00>;
>> >> + };
>> >> +
>> >
>> > This address refers to IMEM, which is shared with a number of other
>> > uses. So I think we should have a simple-mfd (and syscon) with this
>> > within.
>>
>> So talking with Arnd some more it looked like IMEM was really just
>> SRAM. Is that not the case, or is there something else special about
>> it? Does it really need simple-mfd and syscon? I'm still fuzzy on how
>> to use those for this.
>
> If it's SRAM, we should use the SRAM binding and not make it a syscon
> device. What we can have however, is a mostly somewhat reboot-reason
> driver that is able to access an SRAM device or something else,
> depending on what the platform and/or bootloader has.
>
> HTC's Nexus 9 apparently uses a section of normal RAM for communication
> between bootloader and kernel, so we'd also need a way to hook into
> a driver for that.
>
> Arnd
Intel uses EFI variables for that on some AOS platforms. There is a
need for persistent storage abstraction and generalize the reboot
reasons strings.
Second, I wonder why this is submitted under drivers/misc when it
doesn't bind the misc API.
Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists