[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e60a8ccde1940d68ec4780abe154cbd@EMAIL.axentia.se>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:29:37 +0000
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nico@...xnic.net" <nico@...xnic.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: RE: Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled
Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime
> > after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data,
> > but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there
> > is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected
> > and that worked).
> >
> > Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> > Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> >
> > (and please don't forget to cc stable)
>
> I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the issue
> that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the permissive
> domain register setting into the switched-to context.
>
> Can you test this patch please? Thanks.
Still looking good.
Cheers,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists