[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151210162054.GM8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:20:54 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nico@...xnic.net" <nico@...xnic.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:29:37PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime
> > > after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data,
> > > but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there
> > > is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected
> > > and that worked).
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> > > Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> > >
> > > (and please don't forget to cc stable)
> >
> > I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the issue
> > that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the permissive
> > domain register setting into the switched-to context.
> >
> > Can you test this patch please? Thanks.
>
> Still looking good.
Does that mean I can add your reported and tested-by to this latest
patch?
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists