[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUK1raRagO=JxCRpy0_eKfS56gce737fVe9rtJqNwH+_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:38:13 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHV2 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover
from machine checks
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>> Also, are there really PCOMMIT-capable CPUs that still forcibly
>> broadcast MCE? If, so, that's unfortunate.
>
> PCOMMIT and LMCE arrive together ... though BIOS is in the decision
> path to enable LMCE, so it is possible that some systems could still
> broadcast if the BIOS writer decides to not allow local.
I really wish Intel would stop doing that.
>
> But a machine check safe copy_from_user() would be useful
> current generation cpus that broadcast all the time.
Fair enough.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists